High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings

High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings — Journal of Clinical Virology 141, 104895 (2021)
Authors

Alexandra Martin

Alexandre Storto

Quentin Le Hingrat

Gilles Collin

Barbara André

Allison Mallory

Rémi Dangla

Diane Descamps

Benoit Visseaux

Olivier Gossner

Abstract

Background: Worldwide demand for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is still high as testing remains central to follow the disease spread and vaccine efficacy. Group testing has been proposed as a solution to expand testing capabilities but sensitivity concerns may limit its impact on the management of the pandemic. Digital PCR (RT-dPCR) has been shown to be highly sensitive and could help by providing larger testing capabilities without compromising sensitivity.

Methods: We implemented RT-dPCR based COVID-19 group testing on a commercially available system and assay (naica® system from Stilla Technologies) and investigated the sensitivity of the method in real life conditions of a university hospital in Paris, France, in May 2020. We tested the protocol in a direct comparison with reference RT-PCR testing on 448 samples split into groups of 8, 16 and 32 samples for RT-dPCR analysis.

Results: Individual RT-PCR testing identified 25/448 positive samples. Using 56 groups of 8, RT-dPCR identified 23 groups as positive, corresponding to 26 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 95.2% [95% confidence interval: 76.2-99.9%]) and including 2 samples not detected by individual RT-PCR but confirmed positive by further investigation. 15 of 28 groups of 16 tested positive, corresponding to 25 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 87.5% [95% confidence interval: 61.7-98.4%]). 14 groups of 32 were fully concordant with individual PCR testing but will need to be confirmed on larger datasets.

← All research

Journal of Clinical Virology 141, 104895 (2021)

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@article{martin2021,
  author = {Martin, Alexandra and Storto, Alexandre and Le Hingrat,
    Quentin and Collin, Gilles and André, Barbara and Mallory, Allison
    and Dangla, Rémi and Descamps, Diane and Visseaux, Benoit and
    Gossner, Olivier},
  title = {High-Sensitivity {SARS-CoV-2} Group Testing by Digital {PCR}
    Among Symptomatic Patients in Hospital Settings},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Virology},
  volume = {141},
  pages = {104895},
  date = {2021},
  url = {https://gossner.me/papers/high-sensitivity-sars-cov-2-group-testing-by-digital-pcr-among-symptomatic-patients.html},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104895},
  langid = {en},
  abstract = {Background: Worldwide demand for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing
    is still high as testing remains central to follow the disease
    spread and vaccine efficacy. Group testing has been proposed as a
    solution to expand testing capabilities but sensitivity concerns may
    limit its impact on the management of the pandemic. Digital PCR
    (RT-dPCR) has been shown to be highly sensitive and could help by
    providing larger testing capabilities without compromising
    sensitivity. Methods: We implemented RT-dPCR based COVID-19 group
    testing on a commercially available system and assay (naica® system
    from Stilla Technologies) and investigated the sensitivity of the
    method in real life conditions of a university hospital in Paris,
    France, in May 2020. We tested the protocol in a direct comparison
    with reference RT-PCR testing on 448 samples split into groups of 8,
    16 and 32 samples for RT-dPCR analysis. Results: Individual RT-PCR
    testing identified 25/448 positive samples. Using 56 groups of 8,
    RT-dPCR identified 23 groups as positive, corresponding to 26
    positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement
    95.2\% {[}95\% confidence interval: 76.2-99.9\%{]}) and including 2
    samples not detected by individual RT-PCR but confirmed positive by
    further investigation. 15 of 28 groups of 16 tested positive,
    corresponding to 25 positive samples by individual PCR (positive
    percentage agreement 87.5\% {[}95\% confidence interval:
    61.7-98.4\%{]}). 14 groups of 32 were fully concordant with
    individual PCR testing but will need to be confirmed on larger
    datasets.}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Martin, Alexandra, Alexandre Storto, Quentin Le Hingrat, et al. 2021. “High-Sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 Group Testing by Digital PCR Among Symptomatic Patients in Hospital Settings.” Journal of Clinical Virology 141: 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104895.